Buddy, the user-defined form I made, the approval process, can be customized by the administrator.
At present there is no train of thought, everyone give some advice!
I have worked on workflow just before, but I don’t quite understand what your parallelism means. Let’s take a few pictures to see if this is the case:
Processors or processing departments in the process can be customized, and each selection will be kept in the hidden field of the page.
- If it is the combination of departments and personnel, the preservation form is probably like this
u:1; s:3; g:4
,u:1
Indicates that the user with user ID 1 is processed in the first step;s:3
This means that the department with ID bit 3 will actually take out all the personnel under this department for selection when processing in the process. This is the second step. Backg:4
Then the permission group is represented, and so on …- When the processing flow is a single user or a single department, it is sufficient to store the ID directly.
1, 2, 3
So, similarly, the number of steps is arranged in sequence.When the workflow is actually in progress, there may be functions such as approval, call back, re-processing, etc., which need to be considered.
Taking document handling as an example, we need some tables: workflow configuration table, document table and document processing table.I have written the workflow class myself, but it may not be suitable for your scene, so I won’t post it as a disgrace.
It’s probably like this.